London, July 01, 2005
                            Ashok Gupta
                          NRI Hinduja brothers UK- based billionaire were cleared 
                            yesterday by an Indian appeals court of accepting 
                            kickbacks in an arms scandal. Srichand Hinduja and 
                            his brothers, Gopichand and Prakash, were accused 
                            of receiving payments totalling $8.3m in illegal commissions 
                            to help to secure an Indian government contract for 
                            AB Bofors, a Swedish gunmaker. 
                            
                            It took 15 years of legal process and cost Rs. 2.5 
                            billion. The New Delhi high court also dismissed charges 
                            against the Swedish arms manufacturer of paying bribes 
                            on the $1.3bn sale of 400 howitzers to India in 1986. 
                            The judge quash the framing of charges by the chief 
                            metropolitan magistrate against the Hinduja brothers 
                            and the Bofors AB." The bench criticised India's 
                            top criminal investigation agency for failing to produce 
                            any credible evidence to substantiate its original 
                            claims. The judge said evidence from the federal prosecuting 
                            agency, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) 
                            is "useless and dubious material" since 
                            its authenticity could not be verified. 
                           Ram Jethmalani lawyer of Hinduja brothers said that 
                            his clients had made the mistake of not being totally 
                            open to begin with. The Hinduja brothers had long 
                            maintained that the money paid into Swiss bank accounts 
                            was part of a consultancy deal, not a kickback. "It 
                            was their mistake, it made them look as if they were 
                            trying to obstruct the investigation both here and 
                            abroad. But one should still ask why the case continued 
                            for so long," Mr Jethmalani said.