Message to all the victims 
                of Dr. Patel 
              My heart goes out to the patients and their families who suffered 
                at the hand of Dr. Patel. The citizens of Queensland did not deserve 
                to be hurt by their surgeon or their health care system as they 
                did. 
              But, you are victim of more than one person.
              Dr. Jayant Patel:
                Here is a surgeon who has a history of lack of judgment when it 
                came to doing major surgery. The Kaiser or State of Oregon did 
                not revoke his license but placed the restriction for major surgeries. 
                
                
                Many have commented that he was a bad surgeon. This is easy 
                to say but difficult to prove. So many of these surgeons 
                are technically superior and even know more than average surgeons 
                because they are addicted to doing the big surgeries. What was 
                lacking is not the technical know how but a judgment. This is 
                the reason that he got best teachers award or glowing recommendation 
                from some of his peers
                . 
                Unfortunately he was given the position of director of 
                surgery at Bundaberg. Surgeons like him are not as dangerous when 
                they are being monitored by other surgeon but putting them in 
                a leadership position leaves their behavior totally unchecked. 
              
              The Hospital Administration: 
                
                
                Any one with the common sense would have asked a simple question 
                as to if Dr. Patel is so wonderful why is he coming all the way 
                to Australia to work, When he has family and big house in USA? 
                The hospital system in Queensland is grossly under funded 
                and not able to attract good physicians. The rural hospital 
                had trouble attracting any decent physician. Here was a surgeon 
                who loved to operate. From Dr. Patel's point of view when he was 
                restricted from doing big surgery in Oregon and New Yourk, naturally 
                Australia was a logical option. He loved operating more than anything 
                else. 
                Who is responsible for not checking in his background thoroughly 
                prior to his appointment? Even if he can hide his professional 
                track record, how come simple thing like his refusal to wash the 
                hands go for such a long time unchecked?
              Your politicians:
                The system is so broken that when the story leaked 
                out they made a circus of the whole investigation. Your premier 
                became a joke when he decided to send his man to Portland OR to 
                flush him out. I am sure there is a better way to bring a criminal 
                to justice. 
              Your media:
                I guess they must be looking for a sensational story and found 
                one. They fueled all the rumors and no one has asked a simple 
                question as to why all these proceeding had to be a public 
                spectacle and it preceded the report by Peer group (who 
                could be in better position to evaluate Dr. Patel) and they did 
                later on came up with conclusion that he had no ill will and his 
                results are not that bad!
              Media hype created victims:
                The sensational accounts by some of witness without any proper 
                cross examination contributed to declaring him guilty as charged. 
                The peer review of his cases did not confirm all the horror stories 
                printed in the media and promoted by your premier.
              Rampant Racism: 
                The media has made frequent reference to "Indian trained" 
                when referring to Dr. Patel. They fail to understand that Dr. 
                Patel got his medical school and initial surgical training in 
                India but he completed his surgical residency and Surgical Board 
                in USA. Not only that but he did work for NY and Kaiser in Oregon 
                for 19 years. During which he passed his board, received best 
                teacher's award etc. Why keep blaming the "Indian origin"?
              Backlash against Foreign Doctors: 
                
                Since Dr Patel was Indian born and USA trained it is understandable 
                that there may be a backlash against all foreign physicians. I 
                hope you do not forget that nearly 20 percent of your doctors 
                are foreigners and in many cases they give state of the art care. 
                There is no guarantee that an Australian born Australian trained 
                doctor would not do the same thing. Being a good or bad physician 
                is not connected to the country of origin. 
              Where is the check and balances?
                The problem was not only that he loved doing major surgery but 
                problem was the medical system in Australia did not have any mechanism 
                for early detection and correction of anyone performing at an 
                unexpected level. I am not sure if some of his bad result had 
                to do with poor nursing care and post op support.
              Workload to keep two surgeons 
                busy:
                Who will do so much work for so little? He apparently did more 
                than 1200 surgeries in less than 2 years that a very heavy workload. 
              
              Toni is no Erin Brockowitch:
                As I read the testimony of Toni the head nurse it is obvious that 
                she is no angel. I suspect that she had an agenda from early on 
                and was frustrated by her inability to intimidate Dr. Patel. One 
                of the job of head nurse is to make a team to treat patient but 
                she would tell relatives the patient's condition different from 
                what surgeon was reporting. If she had a difference with the surgeon 
                she needed to take it to authorities but not confuse the patients. 
              
              Your Medical system is 20years 
                behind:
                What kind of medical system do you have in Australia? One of the 
                key case where the Toni decided Dr. Patel was incompetent was 
                when a patient in his late forties who had esophageal cancer and 
                the bigger hospital refused to operate on him. When Dr. Patel 
                decided to do surgery Toni (the head nurse) decided he was a bad 
                surgeon. 
                General public may not know this, but a person with esophageal 
                cancer is basically drowning in his saliva, and I have seen even 
                70 year old getting surgery for palliation. What kind of Medical 
                system you have in Australia where a head nurse decides that a 
                surgeon is incompetent because he attempts to palliate young man 
                with esophageal cancer. I think we need to investigate the surgeon 
                who left him to die drowning in his saliva and the nurse who made 
                a judgment on indication of surgery on such a patient. 
              A good surgeon in a poorly supported hospital can get better 
                results than a mediocre surgeon in a well supported hospital.
              All I can say is you need lot more than just bring Dr. Patel 
                to face the justice. You need the revamping of entire health system 
                or tragedy such as this will continue. Next time you will have 
                surgeon who does not operate on you when you need it for the fear 
                of being labeled "Dr. Death"