On Marriage
Issues, India must change 498A before extradite NRIs
India is not a member of the
Hague Conference on Private International Law
Los Angeles, Aug, 14, 2006
Gary Singh
NRIs will be protected to extradite because India
is not a member of The Hague Conference on Private International
Law (or HCCH, for Hague Conference/Conférence de la Haye)
is the preeminent organization in the area of private international
law.
These laws were formulated at a conference at The
Hague. Countries that have signed a treaty can use them.
Sixty-five nations are currently members of the Hague
Conference, including China, Russia, the United States, and all
member states of the European Union.
HCCH was established in in 1893 and is a set of laws
called 'Private International Law' that regulates differences in
laws between two countries. The purpose of HCCH has been to "work
for the progressive unification of the rules of private international
law". It has pursued this goal by creating and assisting in
the implementation of multilateral conventions promoting the harmonization
of conflict of laws principles in diverse subject matters within
private international law.
To stop NRIs from duping their wives,
on Monday, the parliamentary committee on empowerment of women tabled
its recommendations titled "Plight of Indian women deserted
by NRI husbands."
To extradite NRIs or fight cases against NRIs in other
countries, the Indian Govt. must become a member of The Hague Conference
on Private International Law.
According to the IANS report: The absence of uniform
civil laws and the abundance of personal laws of various religious
communities make an NRI marriage dispute more complex. Legal complications
multiply when the dispute becomes international.
Although precise data about fraudulent NRI marriage cases is not
available, 62 cases were reported to the ministry of overseas affairs
in the last three years.
During the same period, 28 cases were reported to the National
Commission for Women, with Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh topping
the list, the committee found.
In within a week of marriage in 2002,
Toronto-based electronics engineer Raghu Modi was told by his wife
(a New Delhi resident) that she had married him for Visa and had
no intention of terminating relationship with her paramour.
After Modi refused to process the immigration formalities
for his wife, she filed a “dowry” case against him and
demanded Rs 26 lakh to “settle” the case. Unable to
bear the harassment, Modi paid Rs 7 lakh to settle the case. Within
a month, his wife married her paramour......Read More: Is
Section 498-A of the IPC, a criminal law? No justice with NRIs
Section 498-A is not acceptable worlwide
and it is joke for NRIs and other countries. If it continue to implement
worldwide, NRIs will have challenge to fight it back.
Let we educate Indian girls and their parents. If they decide to
marry NRIs in hurry or greediness to get a visa, they are responsible
for their Act not the Govt.
|