NRI Bank
-Khalsa Credit Union will remain under government supervision
- Rappointment of Malik was not the only inappropriate board
decision cited. The FICom panel also said it was poor judgment
for the board to hire Malik's lawyer daughter-in-law Sundeep Kaur
Dhaliwal and by extension the law firm of Malik's son Jaspreet
to work for the credit union without even checking Dhaliwal's
references or resume.
Vancouver, June 19, 2006
Manider Singh
On June 14, 2006, Financial Institutions Commission panel has
decided that Khalsa Credit Union will remain under government supervision
because:
- Of a series of poor board decisions, including the re-appointment
of Ripudaman Singh Malik after his acquittal in the Air India
bombing case, a commission has ruled.
- The board's decision to make Malik a director in May 2005 despite
a B.C. Supreme Court ruling in 2003 that he had misled the court
in a bid to get legal aid by diminishing the value of his assets
to make himself look broke.
- Jaspreet Malik had also represented a former employee who sued
the credit union and had been found by Stromberg-Stein to have
misled the court in his dad's legal aid application -- a finding
that cost Jaspreet his own board seat in 2004.
- The board acted irresponsibly by agreeing to pay $2,000 a month
to sponsor radio broadcasts from the Golden Temple for just 900
B.C. subscribers through Khalsa Broadcasting, a company whose
sole director at the time was Jaspreet Malik. A signing officer
for the broadcasters' account was Satwant Singh Sandhu, chair
of the credit union's board.
- The inappropriate hiring of Ms. Sundeep K. Dhaliwal as counsel
for KCU;
- The inappropriate process followed by the Board of Directors
to fill the vacant Director's position created by the resignation
of Jaspreet S. Malik;
- The Board of Director's interference in Mr. Dalbir S. Sohi's
(the "CEO's) efforts in hiring a Senior Manager of Operations
- The Board of Directors interference with the CEO's budget and
marketing plan with respect to advertising;
- The Board of Directors interference with the CEO's efforts
to terminate a manager
- The Board of Directors appointment of Ripudaman S. Malik as
a director when the Board knew or reasonably ought to have known,
of his unsuitability for that position.
"There is an underlying pattern of thinking and decision-making
at the KCU that does not inspire confidence that the directors will
consider matters in the depth and breadth that is necessary at a
large financial institution," the just-released ruling by a
panel of the Financial Institutions Commission says.
"These poor exercises of judgment have raised red flags for
us that demonstrate that the KCU board is not yet ready for KCU
to be released from supervision."
In the 2003 ruling, which was never appealed, Justice Sunni Stromberg-Stein
said Malik's evidence was "unreliable."
"Not only did she not believe Mr. Malik's evidence, but she
found that facts had been manipulated and there was evidence of
collusion," the FICom panel found in its 50-page decision.
"It is difficult to understand why not one of the directors
felt these court proceedings should be reviewed before this new
director appointment was made. The entire matter seems to carry,
on the part of the directors, an air of wilful blindness."
The credit union has been under either supervision or the more
rigorous administration since the late 1990s. The board applied
for release on March 17, 2005 -- the day after Malik's acquittal
in the terrorism case, leading to a hearing that ended last January.
Malik was re-appointed to the board even though the government supervisor
expressed concerns to directors about the move.
"There were many signals that Mr. Ripudaman Singh Malik's
untruthfulness at the [legal aid] application should have been carefully
examined. The directors chose not to do so and this is a prime example
presented to the hearing of poor decision-making and inappropriate
corporate governance," the commission ruledKhalsa Broadcasting's
ownership has since been transferred to another close Malik associate,
Balwant Singh Bhandher.
"The credit union cannot be run as though it is a small, intimate
club, but must be run in a manner that is appropriate to its size
and importance," the commission said.
Malik is not currently a KCU director. He was removed by a separate
order of the superintendent of FICom last November, which said he
was unsuitable for the position because of the Stromberg-Stein ruling,
as well as a number of other issues, including his link to the Babbar
Khalsa terrorist group.
Malik won a court ruling last month that he was ousted before he
had a fair chance to defend himself. But the judge also said FICom
could continue its investigations into his suitability to be a director
of the credit union he founded in 1986.
Malik has since confirmed that he signed a Babbar Khalsa membership
application just three weeks before the Air India bombing and gave
a donation to the group, which was founded by the late Talwinder
Singh Parmar. While Malik was acquitted in the Air India case, the
trial judge accepted that Parmar had masterminded the terrorist
bombings that left 331 dead.
By Ranvir Singh Randhawa
The commission posed the question: "How
can supervision
be justified over a financial institution whose financial performance
is adequate?" It then went on to answer it: "Of course
the answer is that a financial institution whose corporate governance
is inadequate in respect of important questions has a real and significant
risk of making judgments that are contrary to the best interests
of depositors and stakeholders. In this present case, KCU's financial
performance has improved during a period of general economic growth
and while subject to supervision. It would be folly to assume that,
without effective corporate governance, it would continue to do
so without supervision and/or during periods when economic times
are less favourable."
The decision noted that in a pre-hearing conference last November,
that the acting superintendent had opposed the release of KCU from
supervision "due to the
corporate governance practices and inappropriate decision-making
of the Board
of Director," which included:
And during the hearing, the acting superintendent was allowed
to add another reason:
- The directors' undermining of the CEO by encouraging complaints
about the CEO from employees.
Incidentally, Sundeep K. Dhaliwal is the wife of Jaspreet S.
Malik, the son of Ripudaman Singh Malik. She uses her maiden
name.
The report also noted: "KCU presently has about 11,000
active accounts and about $120 million in assets. Its head office
is in Surrey. It has five branch offices in the Lower Mainland
of British Columbia and in Victoria. By any standard KCU has
established itself firmly in the Sikh community of British Columbia."
It also pointed out: "KCU has been under supervision for
nearly half of its existence. KCU was under supervision (including
the appointment of an administrator) from May 1989 to September
1992 because its internal controls and business practices were
considered inadequate to safeguard the interests of depositors
and creditors and posed a risk of claims against the deposit
insurance fund . In August 1999, pursuant to KCU's written request
made on the recommendation of Stabilization Central Credit Union
of British Columbia (SCCU), the Commission again ordered that
KCU be placed under supervision as a result of serious irregularities
in KCU's financial controls and concerns about the effective
operation of the KCU Board. In February 2000, the supervision
order was amended when the Commission ordered that KCU be placed
under administration. KCU appealed the administration order
to the former Commercial Appeals Commission (CAC). The CAC'S
October 23,2000 decision allowed the appeal respecting the appointment
of an administrator, but maintained supervision according to
various terms set out in its decision
|