Vancouver; June 15, 2004
Globe and Mail
The wives of suspects in the Air-India international
terrorism trial should be called to testify about the activities of
their husbands, prosecutor Joe Bellows said yesterday.
The wives could provide the best available evidence on what their spouses
discussed at one of the last meetings before the suspects are alleged
to have bought airline tickets used to put bombs on flights from Vancouver,
he said.
The prosecution says defendant Ripudaman Singh Malik and suspect Hardial
Singh Johal met at the home of alleged Air-India mastermind Talwinder
Singh Parmar on June 18, 1985, to go over plans for the bombings five
days later that killed 331 people.
However, defence lawyers at the trial have said the three men met at
that time to discuss a lawsuit against an Indo-Canadian newspaper. To
back up their suggestion, they asked the court yesterday to accept an
entry in a diary kept by Mr. Johal as evidence in the trial.
"In the evening, there was a meeting about Indo-Canadian paper
at [Mr. Parmar's] house. Malik and others came," Mr. Johal wrote
in his diary under the date of June 18, 1985.
Both Mr. Johal and Mr. Parmar are dead. Mr. Parmar was killed in India
in 1992. Mr. Johal died of natural causes in 2002. Neither was ever
charged in the Air-India case.
Mr. Bellows dismissed the journal entry as contrived, self-serving
evidence that cannot be tested in cross-examination. Mr. Johal could
have written the entry after the Air-India disaster in case he had to
prove his innocence, he said.
Before accepting the entry as evidence, the court is required by legal
precedents to consider whether other sources of information are available,
Mr. Bellows added.
Mr. Malik's wife, Raminder, and the widows of Mr. Parmar and Mr. Johal
likely know the purpose of the 1985 meeting, he said.
Mr. Justice Ian Bruce Josephson asked whether the spouses would have
firsthand information about the meeting.
Canadian Security Intelligence Service agents, who had the Parmar home
under surveillance in 1985, saw neither Mr. Johal's nor Mr. Malik's
wife at the Parmar residence that day, the court has heard. Mr. Parmar's
wife was seen putting out garbage at 9:15 a.m. She left the house at
1:32 p.m. and was not seen again on June 18, 1985.
The meeting of alleged conspirators took place in the evening. Mr.
Parmar was seen at his home at 7:29 p.m., talking with two men who were
later identified as Mr. Johal and Mr. Malik. When CSIS surveillance
stopped at 9:50, the three men were still in discussion.
How would the spouses know what the husbands were talking about, if
they were not at the meeting, the judge asked.
Even if they were not at the meeting, they would be aware of the lawsuit
if it were as important as defence counsel suggested, Mr. Bellows said.
Judge Josephson reserved his decision on whether Mr. Johal's journal
entry should be accepted as evidence without hearing from the suspects'
wives.
Mr. Malik and another B.C. man, Ajaib Singh Bagri, are on trial for
murder in the deaths of 331 people killed in two bomb blasts on June
23, 1985.